Skip to main content

Changing Patterns of Higher Education Governance Under Neoliberalism: Global and East Asian Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Higher Education Governance in East Asia

Abstract

This study classified higher education governance across 20 higher education systems. Six higher education systems are from East Asia and the other 14 systems from the other five continents. According to a cluster analysis and profiling analysis, this study found that most higher education systems are converging around managerial governance where institutional managers hold stronger power than other actors such as state or academics. However, the governance patterns also differ by fields of works (finance, personnel, and academic fields). This study also found that the six East Asian systems are equally distributed in each of “Bureaucratic Governance” (China and Malaysia), “Managerial Governance” (Korea and Hong Kong), and “Collegial Governance” (Japan and Taiwan). This study also predicts the convergence might continue in the future although the institutionalization process might differ depending on historical and socio-political contexts of each system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altbach, P. G. (1989). Twisted roots: Western impact on Asian higher education. Higher Education, 18(1), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. (2006). Carving out time and space in the managerial university. Journal of Organizational Change, 19(5), 578–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. O. (1971). Statewide coordination of higher education. American Council on Education: Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1990). Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (2000). The lifecycle of academic management fads. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D., & Merrien, F. (1999). Governance of universities and modernization of the states: Analytical aspects. In D. Braun & F. X. Merrien (Eds.), Towards a new model of governance for universities? A comparative view (pp. 9–33). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, C. (2004). What about the workers? The expansion of higher education and the transformation of academic work. Industrial Relations Journal, 35(1), 38–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: Potential problems of more autonomy. Higher Education, 62(4), 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2003). Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, The Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 3(2), 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2014). Higher Education governance and policy change in Western Europe: International challenges to historical institutions. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vogtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education. Higher Education, 62(5), 665–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1997). A victim of their own success? Employment and working conditions of academic staff in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 34(3), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. (2003). Market management, and “reengineering” higher education. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 585, 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H. (1992). The decline of donnish dominion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management: Into the age of paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, M. (2009). Incorporation of national universities in Japan design, implementation and consequences. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(1), 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M., & Hanney, S. (2000). Reforming higher education, higher education policy series 50. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolsaker, A. (2008). Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: A study of English universities. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, D. W., & Novak, R. J. (2003). Substance versus politics: Through the dark mirror of governance reform. Educational Policy, 17(1), 98–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (1997). Steering from a distance: Power relations in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 34(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, P. (2009). Competitiveness, diversification and the international higher education cash flow: The EU’s higher education discourse amidst the challenges of globalization. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 19(2), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, O. C. (1996). The paradigms of governance in higher education systems. Higher Education Policy, 9(2), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehde, V. (2006). Governance, administrative science, and the paradoxes of new public management. Public Policy and Administration, 21(4), 60–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H. D., & Rowan, B. (Eds.). (2006). The new institutionalism in education. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2010). When state centralism meets neo-liberalism: Managing university governance change in Singapore and Malaysia. Higher Education, 60(4), 419–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2009). The Bologna process as alpha or omega, or, on interpreting history and contexts as inputs to Bologna, Prague, Berlin and beyond. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Massen (Eds.), European integration and the governance of higher education and research (pp. 17–58). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, D., Shin, J., & Hawkins, J. (Eds.). (2013). The dynamics of higher education development in East Asia: Asian cultural heritage, western dominance, economic development, and globalization. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (2009). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rakic, V. (2001). Converge or not converge: The European Union and higher education policies in the Netherlands, Belgium/Flanders and Germany. Higher Education Policy, 14(3), 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. (2002). New managerialism, professional power and organizational governance in UK universities: A review and assessment. In A. Amaral, G. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (pp. 163–186). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002). Quality assurance in Europe and the U.S.: Professional and political economic framing of higher education policy. Higher Education, 43(3), 355–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C. (2013). Higher education development in East Asia countries focusing on cultural tradition and economic systems. In D. Neubauer, J. C. Shin, & J. Hawkins (Eds.), The dynamics of higher education development in East Asia: Asian cultural heritage, western dominance, economic development, and globalization. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2014). Teaching and research across higher education systems: Typology and implications. In J. C. Shin, A. Arimoto, W. K. Cummings, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Teaching and research in contemporary higher education (pp. 381–394). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., & Kehm, B. M. (Eds.). (2013). Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., Postiglione, G. A., & Huang, F. (Eds.). (2015). Mass higher education development in East Asia. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steck, H. (2003). Corporatization of the university: Seeking conceptual clarity. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 585, 66–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Ed.). (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vught, F. (1989). Governmental strategies and innovation in higher education. London: Jassica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogtle, E. M. (2014). Higher education policy convergence and the Bologna Process: A cross national study. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, J. F. (1986). Campus autonomy and its relationship to measures of university quality. Journal of Higher Education, 57(5), 510–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, J. F. (1989). Changes in quality among public universities. Journal of Higher Education, 60(2), 136–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, J. F., & Malik, S. M. (1997). State regulation and administrative flexibility at public universities. Research in Higher Education, 38(1), 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. K., & Shen, F. X. (2002). Politics of state-led reform in education: Market competition and electoral dynamics. Educational Policy, 16(1), 161–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A draft of this chapter was presented at the 48th Annual Conference of the Japan Educational Administration Society (Oct. 12, 2013, Kyoto University, Japan).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung Cheol Shin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shin, J.C., Kim, Y. (2018). Changing Patterns of Higher Education Governance Under Neoliberalism: Global and East Asian Perspectives. In: Shin, J. (eds) Higher Education Governance in East Asia. Higher Education in Asia: Quality, Excellence and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2469-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2469-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2468-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2469-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics